“Unique as being one of the few equestrian portraits ever
done by the artist,” remarked the king, jingling the nickels in his trouser
pocket.
Browns and yellows mostly. Sooty
sky, sun setting
behind a slagheap, or a hill, or is
this the setting
of a story too grand to tell? And a
splash of red:
rider’s stout leg, crown of his
hat. Sure, I’ve read
the experts: they explain he’s a
Catholic knight;
yes, yes, it’s a good moral piece,
but look at the night-
time shadows and the boy rider’s
steady wide eyes,
staring out of the frame. And not
at me. God, I
loathe those fat-face portraits
that glower and pry like
death’s photogravure. Enough is
enough, tho’ I do like
this whitey-brown horse, spavined
and panting—
Why, my life’s as true as a cracked
old painting,
now and again now
and again.
Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn (1606–69), The Polish Rider, c. 1655. Oil on canvas. 46 x 53⅛ in.
[from Chestnut Ridge, a verse-history of southwestern Pennsylvania]
**
The Frick Collection's website will tell you more about both Rembrandt's remarkable painting and the history of Henry Clay Frick's art acquisitions . . .
. . . whereas this poster will explain how he earned the money to buy it.
1 comment:
Teddy Roosevelt's robber barons (Carnegie's steel mills apparently claimed, on average, three workers a week) become the benefactors of the nation. Paradox sometimes too small a word.
Post a Comment