from The Birth of the Modern: World Society, 1815-1830 by Paul Johnson
Until about 1825 it was considered quite proper for a lady to comment on a gentleman's legs, which were carefully observed and compared. Men did the same. . . . When Thomas De Quincey published his reminiscences of Wordsworth, one of the passages that gave most offense to the poet, his wife and sister concerned legs: '[Wordsworth's] legs were pointedly condemned by all the female connoisseurs in legs that I ever heard lecture upon that topic; not that they were bad in any way which would force itself upon your notice--there was no absolute deformity about them; and undoubtedly they have been serviceable legs beyond the average standard of human requisition; for I calculate, upon good data, that with these identical legs Wordsworth must have traversed a distance of 175,000 to 180,000 English miles--a mode of exertion which, to him, stood in the stead of wine, spirits and all other stimulants whatsoever to the human spirits; to which he has been indebted to a life of unclouded happiness, and we for much of what is most excellent in his writings. But, useful as they have proved themselves, the Wordsworthian legs were certainly not ornamental; and it really was a pity, as I agreed with a lady in thinking, that he had not another pair for evening dress parties, when no boots lend their friendly aid to mask our imperfections from the eyes of female rigorists.'"
never considered Wordsworth as eye candy, myself.
ReplyDelete=b